Typhoid conjugate vaccine effectiveness in Malawi: evaluation of a test-negative design using randomised, controlled clinical trial data - The Lancet

Introduction

Typhoid fever, a systemic infection caused by Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi (S Typhi), is transmitted through contaminated food and water. In 2019, there were an estimated 9·24 million cases of typhoid fever globally and 110 000 deaths, with the greatest burden in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) in sub-Saharan Africa and Asia.
1
Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation
Typhoid fever—level 4 cause.
Increasing antimicrobial resistance, including the emergence of extensively drug resistant isolates, limits treatment options in many settings and has created an urgency to adopt effective preventive measures.
2
  • Carey ME
  • McCann NS
  • Gibani MM
Typhoid fever control in the 21st century: where are we now?.
In 2017, WHO recommended routine use of typhoid conjugate vaccine in children aged 6 months and older in endemic settings.
3
WHO
Typhoid vaccines: WHO position paper, March 2018—recommendations.
Since then, excellent typhoid conjugate vaccine efficacy has been shown in randomised controlled trials in LMICs.
4
  • Shakya M
  • Voysey M
  • Theiss-Nyland K
  • et al.
Efficacy of typhoid conjugate vaccine in Nepal: final results of a phase 3, randomised, controlled trial.
, 
5
  • Qadri F
  • Khanam F
  • Liu X
  • et al.
Protection by vaccination of children against typhoid fever with a Vi-tetanus toxoid conjugate vaccine in urban Bangladesh: a cluster-randomised trial.
, 
6
  • Patel PD
  • Patel P
  • Liang Y
  • et al.
Safety and efficacy of a typhoid conjugate vaccine in Malawian children.
, 
7
  • Shakya M
  • Colin-Jones R
  • Theiss-Nyland K
  • et al.
Phase 3 efficacy analysis of a typhoid conjugate vaccine trial in Nepal.
With the support of Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, typhoid conjugate vaccine has been introduced into routine immunisation programmes in Pakistan, Liberia, Zimbabwe, and Nepal, with more countries expected to introduce it soon.
8
International Vaccine Access CenterJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
VIEW-hub.
In 2022, the WHO Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization reviewed newly available data from surveillance studies, efficacy trials, and early country introductions and reaffirmed the typhoid conjugate vaccine recommendations.
9
WHO
Meeting of the Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization April 2022: conclusions and recommendations.
Post-introduction vaccine evaluations are necessary to understand vaccine performance under real-world conditions and to provide information to sustain vaccination programmes and support decision making. Case-control studies offer an efficient approach to estimate vaccine effectiveness, because cases are identified based on disease status (ie, the outcome of interest), and sample size requirements tend to be smaller than for other study designs, especially for diseases with low prevalence.
10
  • Rodrigues LC
  • Smith PG
Use of the case-control approach in vaccine evaluation: efficacy and adverse effects.
However, identification of appropriate controls can be challenging.
11
  • Verani JR
  • Baqui AH
  • Broome CV
  • et al.
Case-control vaccine effectiveness studies: preparation, design, and enrollment of cases and controls.
For example, controls recruited from the community might be less likely to access health care when they are ill and less likely to be immunised, compared with cases recruited at health facilities. This confounding can lead to biased estimates of vaccine effectiveness. A design that reduces potential bias due to differential health-care-seeking behaviours is the test-negative design.
12
  • Vandenbroucke JP
  • Pearce N
Test-negative designs: differences and commonalities with other case-control studies with "other patient" controls.
The test-negative design is a variation of the case-control study in which participants who present with illness are classified as cases or controls on the basis of diagnostic testing for the pathogen in question.
13
  • Sullivan SG
  • Tchetgen Tchetgen EJ
  • Cowling BJ
Theoretical basis of the test-negative study design for assessment of influenza vaccine effectiveness.
Research in context

Evidence before this study

As typhoid conjugate vaccines are introduced into national immunisation programmes, post-introduction monitoring of vaccine performance is important to understand how vaccines work under real-world conditions. The test-negative design has previously been efficiently used to evaluate post-introduction vaccine effectiveness for other vaccines. We aimed to validate the usefulness of the test-negative design for typhoid conjugate vaccines using a gold-standard randomised controlled trial database. We searched PubMed on Oct 17, 2022, with no date or language restrictions, using the terms (typhoid conjugate vaccine) AND (randomised controlled trial). Our search identified 47 papers, including four randomised controlled trials investigating typhoid conjugate vaccines, and no studies reporting the use of the randomised trials for test-negative design validation in relation to typhoid conjugate vaccines. We did a second search of PubMed on Oct 17, 2022, with no date or language restrictions, using the terms (typhoid conjugate vaccine) AND (case control study or test negative design). This second search identified 20 papers, and did not find any studies reporting the use of the randomised trials for test-negative design validation in relation to typhoid conjugate vaccines.

Added value of this study

To our knowledge, this is the first study to rigorously evaluate the use of a test-negative design to estimate vaccine effectiveness. This study validated the test-negative design core assumption that typhoid conjugate vaccine has no effect on febrile illnesses that are not caused by typhoid. Furthermore, this study showed the accuracy and precision of vaccine effectiveness estimates derived using the test-negative design compared with gold-standard randomised controlled trial vaccine efficacy results in a Malawian paediatric population. Importantly, the effect of blood culture sensitivity was minimal for vaccine effectiveness estimation accuracy, especially when typhoid-positive cultures comprised fewer than 10% of all blood cultures.

Implications of all the available evidence

The effectiveness of new vaccines should be evaluated after their introduction by use of the most rigorous approach possible. In the absence of randomised trials, epidemiological designs can be used to estimate vaccine effectiveness. Our study provides evidence to support the use of the test-negative design to measure post-introduction vaccine effectiveness of typhoid conjugate vaccines in Malawi and other similar settings. This efficient method to evaluate the performance of newly introduced typhoid conjugate vaccines could be a potential tool to generate crucial evidence for the continued support of existing vaccination programmes and to support decisions on whether to introduce typhoid conjugate vaccines in other countries. As in all observational study designs, the test-negative design remains susceptible to selection bias, confounding, and misclassification of vaccine and outcome status. The test-negative design should be considered only when a case-control study design is appropriate.

The test-negative design has been extensively used to measure pneumococcal, influenza, rotavirus, and COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness.
14
  • Thompson MG
  • Stenehjem E
  • Grannis S
  • et al.
Effectiveness of Covid-19 vaccines in ambulatory and inpatient care settings.
, 
15
  • Dean NE
  • Hogan JW
  • Schnitzer ME
Covid-19 vaccine effectiveness and the test-negative design.
, 
16
  • Chua H
  • Feng S
  • Lewnard JA
  • et al.
The use of test-negative controls to monitor vaccine effectiveness: a systematic review of methodology.
As an efficient and simple study design, the test-negative design offers advantages for typhoid conjugate vaccine evaluation after introduction in LMICs. However, not all diseases are amenable to the test-negative design. For typhoid, the validity of the test-negative design might be affected by low disease incidence and reliance on moderately sensitive blood culture for diagnosis.
17
  • Mogasale V
  • Ramani E
  • Mogasale VV
  • Park J
What proportion of Salmonella Typhi cases are detected by blood culture? A systematic literature review.
In this study, we evaluate the test-negative design to estimate typhoid conjugate vaccine effectiveness using a previously published randomised trial of typhoid conjugate vaccine (typhoid Vi polysaccharide-tetanus toxoid conjugate vaccine [Vi-TT]) in Malawi as the gold standard comparator.
6
  • Patel PD
  • Patel P
  • Liang Y
  • et al.
Safety and efficacy of a typhoid conjugate vaccine in Malawian children.
The objectives of this study were threefold: to verify the core assumption of the test-negative design, that Vi-TT has no effect on non-typhoid fever, to compare vaccine effectiveness derived by the test-negative design with randomised trial efficacy results, and to assess the effect of case-control matching, vaccine miscalculation, and blood culture sensitivity to detect typhoid fever on vaccine effectiveness estimation in the test-negative design.

Methods

Study design and participants

Participant eligibility, enrolment, and population definitions in the comparator randomised trial have been described previously.
6
  • Patel PD
  • Patel P
  • Liang Y
  • et al.
Safety and efficacy of a typhoid conjugate vaccine in Malawian children.
, 
18
  • Meiring JE
  • Laurens MB
  • Patel P
  • et al.
Typhoid Vaccine Acceleration Consortium Malawi: a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial of the clinical efficacy of typhoid conjugate vaccine among children in Blantyre, Malawi.
This parent trial was approved by the Malawi National Health Sciences Research Committee; the Malawi Pharmacy, Medicines, and Regulatory Authority; the institutional review board at the University of Maryland, Baltimore (MD, USA); and the research ethics committee at the University of Liverpool (Liverpool, UK). The present study was a post-hoc analysis of existing data and is detailed in the original study statistical analysis plan.
Briefly, in the randomised trial per-protocol sample, 27 882 Malawian children in Blantyre aged 9 months to 12 years were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive a single dose of Vi-TT or meningococcal capsular group A conjugate vaccine (MenA) from Feb 21 to Sept 27, 2018. Participants (13 945 in the Vi-TT group and 13 937 in the MenA group; median age at vaccination 6 years; 14 198 [51%] of 27 882 participants were female) were followed up for blood culture-confirmed typhoid fever with passive surveillance. Participants who presented with febrile illness at outpatient health centres and tertiary facilities in two urban townships (Ndirande and Zingwangwa) in Blantyre, Malawi had a blood culture sample collected if they met one of the following protocol-defined specimen collection criteria: subjective fever for at least 72 h, measured fever of at least 38°C, or hospitalisation with history of fever of any duration. Blood culture results were classified as follows: positive for typhoid, negative for typhoid but positive for a non-typhoid pathogen, or negative for any pathogen or positive for contaminants. All facilities within the study area with blood culture capacity were included in the randomised trial. Vaccine efficacy results for participants followed up until April 3, 2020 (ie, 18–24 months after vaccination), have been reported previously.
6
  • Patel PD
  • Patel P
  • Liang Y
  • et al.
Safety and efficacy of a typhoid conjugate vaccine in Malawian children.
This evaluation used efficacy data from participants followed up until Sept 30, 2021. The test-negative design sample included all participants in the randomised trial who had a blood culture sample collected at least 14 days after vaccination with a reported blood culture result. Blood cultures that grew S Typhi were classified as test-positive. Negative blood cultures, and those that grew a non-typhoid pathogen or a contaminant, were considered test-negative.
In the test-negative design, only participants with at least one blood culture specimen collected were considered for the vaccine effectiveness analysis. Because some participants had more than one episode with a blood culture specimen collected, three test-negative design samples were selected, corresponding to three different analysis approaches to estimate the vaccine effectiveness, as described previously, as follows: participant-based analysis sample without censoring for typhoid (test-negative design A); participant-based analysis sample with censoring for typhoid (test-negative design B); and specimen-based analysis sample (test-negative design C).
19
  • De Serres G
  • Skowronski DM
  • Wu XW
  • Ambrose CS
The test-negative design: validity, accuracy and precision of vaccine efficacy estimates compared to the gold standard of randomised placebo-controlled clinical trials.
Both test-negative design A and test-negative design B are participant-based analysis samples where cases were participants who had ever had a typhoid-positive blood culture test during the study period. In test-negative design A, controls included participants with an episode of non-typhoid illness, without excluding those who might have tested positive for typhoid at another time within the study period. In test-negative design B, controls included only participants with an episode of non-typhoid illness, who never had a positive test for typhoid at any time during the study period. In test-negative design C, the units of analysis were specimens rather than individuals, and cases were typhoid-positive specimens and controls were typhoid-negative specimens.

Statistical analysis

In the randomised controlled trial per-protocol analysis, vaccine efficacy against blood culture-confirmed typhoid fever up to Sept 30, 2021, was calculated as (1 – incidence rate ratio [IRR]) × 100%, where IRR is the ratio of the incidence rate in the Vi-TT group to that in the MenA group, as described in the study protocol and the published 18–24-month analysis.
6
  • Patel PD
  • Patel P
  • Liang Y
  • et al.
Safety and efficacy of a typhoid conjugate vaccine in Malawian children.
, 
18
  • Meiring JE
  • Laurens MB
  • Patel P
  • et al.
Typhoid Vaccine Acceleration Consortium Malawi: a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial of the clinical efficacy of typhoid conjugate vaccine among children in Blantyre, Malawi.
In a sensitivity analysis, vaccine efficacy was also calculated as (1– relative risk [RR]) × 100%, where RR is the relative risk of blood culture-confirmed typhoid fever in the Vi-TT group compared with the MenA group.
In each of the three test-negative design samples, vaccine effectiveness against typhoid fever was calculated as (1 – odds ratio [OR]) × 100%, where OR is the relative odds of Vi-TT vaccination in cases compared with controls. The Woolf approximation method was used to compute 95% CIs for the ORs. All randomised trial participants were used to test the core assumption of the test-negative design, that Vi-TT has no effect on non-typhoid fever. Vaccine efficacy against non-typhoid illness was calculated as (1 – RR) × 100%, where RR is the relative risk of participants or specimens testing negative for typhoid in the Vi-TT group compared with the MenA group. Three methods were used (participant-based with or without censoring and specimen-based analysis).
19
  • De Serres G
  • Skowronski DM
  • Wu XW
  • Ambrose CS
The test-negative design: validity, accuracy and precision of vaccine efficacy estimates compared to the gold standard of randomised placebo-controlled clinical trials.
The exact method was used to compute 95% CIs for the RRs. All vaccine effectiveness analyses described against typhoid and non-typhoid fever were repeated for each of the following prespecified subgroups: age (vs ≥5 years), sex (male vs female), and study site.
Instead of using all available controls, a matched test-negative design was simulated to examine the effect of matching key study variables on vaccine efficacy estimates. A matched test-negative design is preferable because it improves the comparability between cases and controls and requires data collection on fewer individuals. Mahalanobis multivariate-distance nearest-neighbour matching without replacement was used to match each typhoid-positive specimen with three typhoid-negative specimens (appendix pp 1–2). Cases and controls were matched exactly on age categories (vs 2 years to vs ≥5 years) and study site. To reduce potential bias due to typhoid seasonality, blood culture dates were matched within 20 days for each case-control pair (295 [97%] of 303 specimens were matched within 7 days). Vaccine effectiveness against typhoid fever was calculated as (1 – OR) × 100%, where OR was estimated using mixed-effects logistic regression to account for the potential correlations among matched cases and controls introduced by the study design.
To examine the effect of vaccine misclassification on test-negative design vaccine effectiveness estimation, we assumed that poor vaccination records affected both cases and controls equally. Different probabilities of misclassifying vaccinated individuals as unvaccinated and misclassifying unvaccinated individuals as vaccinated were considered (appendix pp 3–4). The estimated vaccine effectiveness with corresponding 95% CIs under various overall vaccine misclassification rates was calculated. The test-negative design specimen-based method was used with vaccine effectiveness calculated as (1 – OR) × 100%.
To examine the effect of blood culture sensitivity in detecting typhoid fever on vaccine effectiveness estimation, the test-negative design specimen-based method was used.
19
  • De Serres G
  • Skowronski DM
  • Wu XW
  • Ambrose CS
The test-negative design: validity, accuracy and precision of vaccine efficacy estimates compared to the gold standard of randomised placebo-controlled clinical trials.
Fixed blood culture sensitivity was assumed, that is, sensitivity does not depend on time since infection or vary across individuals. The Vi-TT vaccination rate among the false-negative specimens was assumed to be the same as the vaccination rate among the typhoid-positive specimens. Additionally, we assumed no misclassification of vaccination status. Various blood culture positivity rates (ie, the proportion of blood culture specimens that were typhoid-positive) were also used to examine the effect of typhoid prevalence on vaccine effectiveness estimation using a test-negative design (appendix p 5).

A data and safety management board oversaw the randomised controlled trial, but not the present study. All analyses were done using Stata/SE version 17.

Role of the funding source

The funder of the study had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report.

Results

The study sample derivation is shown in figure 1. After excluding those who did not meet per-protocol criteria, the final study sample included 27 882 unique children, of whom 21 664 had no blood culture specimen collected (non-test-negative design sample) and 6218 had at least one blood culture specimen (test-negative design sample). Among the 6218 children in the test-negative design sample, 4759 (76·5%) had only one blood culture specimen collected, 1123 (18·1%) had two blood culture specimens collected, and 336 (5·4%) had three or more blood culture specimens collected, comprising a total of 8161 blood culture specimens. There were 101 typhoid-positive specimens (cases) from 97 unique children and 8060 typhoid-negative specimens (controls) from 6121 unique children.
Figure thumbnail gr1

Figure 1Study sample derivation

Compared with children in the non-test-negative design sample (table 1), children who had at least one blood culture specimen collected and hence were included in the test-negative design sample were significantly younger, with a higher proportion enrolled from the Zingwangwa study site. Sex and vaccine group distributions did not differ between the test-negative design sample and the non-test-negative design sample.

Table 1Participant baseline characteristics by availability of blood culture specimens

Data are n (%), unless otherwise indicated. MenA=meningococcal capsular group A conjugate vaccine. Vi-TT=typhoid Vi polysaccharide-tetanus toxoid-conjugate vaccine.

Vaccine efficacy against typhoid fever in the randomised trial up to September, 2021 (ie, at least 3 years after vaccination), was 80·4% (95% CI 66·4 to 88·5) based on the IRR method and 80·3% (66·3 to 88·4) based on the RR method. For all three test-negative design approaches, vaccine effectiveness estimates (test-negative design A, 80·3% [95% CI 66·2 to 88·5] vs test-negative design B, 80·5% [66·5 to 88·6] vs test-negative design C, 80·4% [66·9 to 88·4]) were almost identical to the randomised trial results (table 2, figure 2). Receipt of Vi-TT did not affect the risk of non-typhoid fever (vaccine efficacy against non-typhoid fever –0·4% [95% CI –4·9 to 3·9] vs –1% [–5·6 to 3·3] vs –2·5% [–6·4 to 1·3] for test-negative design A, test-negative design B, and test-negative design C, respectively; table 2).

Table 2Influence of vaccine against blood culture-confirmed typhoid and non-typhoid illnesses, estimated by per-protocol and three test-negative design analysis approaches

Data are n or n/N (%), unless otherwise indicated. MenA=meningococcal capsular group A conjugate vaccine. VE=vaccine efficacy in the randomised controlled trial or vaccine effectiveness in the test-negative design. Vi-TT=typhoid Vi polysaccharide-tetanus toxoid-conjugate vaccine.

Figure thumbnail gr2

Figure 2Effect of vaccine on blood culture-confirmed typhoid overall and by subgroups

Show full caption

VE=Vaccine efficacy in the randomised controlled trial or vaccine effectiveness in the test-negative design.

Subgroup analyses were done by age, sex, and study site (figure 2; appendix pp 6–7). All three test-negative design analysis approaches produced similar results, with point estimates and corresponding 95% CIs almost identical to the per-protocol randomised trial results (figure 2). Additionally, Vi-TT had no effect on non-typhoid fever in all subgroups (appendix pp 6–7).
The simulated 1:3 case-control matched test-negative design (101 typhoid-positive specimens vs 303 typhoid-negative specimens) produced a vaccine effectiveness estimate of 80·9% (95% CI 66·4–89·2; appendix p 8). These results were almost identical to the test-negative design, with all 8060 controls (80·4% [66·9–88·4]) and to the original randomised trial results (vaccine efficacy against typhoid fever: (1 – IRR) × 100%=80·4% [66·4–88·5] or (1 – RR) × 100%=80·3% [66·3–88·4]).
Vaccine misclassification might have affected the estimation of vaccine effectiveness in a test-negative design (table 3). If the classification of vaccination status was 100% correct (ie, misclassification rate 0%—gold standard), the estimated vaccine effectiveness against typhoid was 80·4% (95% CI 66·9–88·4). If the overall misclassification rate was 5%, the estimated vaccine effectiveness was 84·0% (70·8–91·3) when misclassification occurred in one direction only (misclassifying vaccinated as unvaccinated, eg, due to the loss of vaccination cards) for both cases and controls; the lowest possible vaccine effectiveness was 67·0% (47·0–79·5) and the highest possible was 89·3% (80·4–94·2) when differential misclassification was allowed (appendix pp 3–4). Both the lowest and the highest vaccine effectiveness estimate 95% CIs overlapped with the 95% CI for the gold standard vaccine effectiveness estimate, suggesting the differences were not statistically significant. However, when the overall misclassification rate was 10% or higher, the lowest possible vaccine effectiveness and the highest possible vaccine effectiveness were significantly different from the gold standard vaccine effectiveness estimate, suggesting the estimates under these scenarios were no longer reliable or consistent given the accurate vaccination status (table 3).

Table 3Effect of overall vaccine misclassification rate (p1 + p2) on vaccine effectiveness estimation by test-negative design specimen-based analysis

Data are n/N (%), unless otherwise indicated. See the appendix (pp 3–4) for further details. p1=probability of misclassifying vaccinated as unvaccinated. p2=probability of misclassifying unvaccinated as vaccinated. VE=vaccine effectiveness. Vi-TT=typhoid Vi polysaccharide-tetanus toxoid-conjugate vaccine.
101 (1·2%) of 8161 blood culture specimens were positive for S Typhi. As blood culture sensitivity decreased from 100% to 30%, the adjusted point estimates of vaccine effectiveness increased only slightly, from 80·4% to 81·%, but the width of the 95% CIs became much narrower, decreasing from 0·215 to 0·111 (table 4; appendix p 5). Additionally, as the proportion of blood cultures that were typhoid-positive increased from 1·2% to 10·0%, the effect of blood culture sensitivity on the point estimate of vaccine effectiveness became stronger, although still not significantly different, as shown by overlapping 95% CIs in all scenarios except the scenario in which blood culture sensitivity was 30% and 10% of blood cultures were positive for S Typhi (table 4).

Table 4Effect of blood culture test sensitivity on vaccine effectiveness estimation by test-negative design specimen-based analysis, stratified by blood culture positivity rate

Data are n/N (%), unless otherwise indicated. We assumed the vaccination rate among the false negatives was the same as the vaccination rate among the cases (appendix p 5). BCS=blood culture sensitivity. VE=vaccine effectiveness.

Discussion

In a paediatric population in Malawi, estimates of Vi-TT effectiveness against blood culture-confirmed typhoid fever derived by the simulated test-negative design were almost identical to the gold standard randomised controlled trial vaccine efficacy results. Vi-TT had no effect on non-typhoid fever, further validating a core assumption of the test-negative design. In subgroup analyses by age, sex, and study site, the results remained highly consistent with the randomised trial vaccine efficacy estimates, and Vi-TT similarly had no effect on non-typhoid fever. Further evidence of test-negative design accuracy was shown in a simulated 1:3 case-control matched test-negative design analysis, which produced almost identical results to test-negative design analyses that used all controls, and to the original randomised trial. The finding that case-control matching made little difference to efficacy estimates is consistent with work by Dean and colleagues.
20
  • Dean NE
  • Halloran ME
  • Longini Jr, IM
Temporal confounding in the test-negative design.
Our results support use of a matched test-negative design study as a suitable method to estimate typhoid conjugate vaccine effectiveness in preventing blood culture-confirmed S Typhi as these vaccines are introduced in low-resource settings.
Although the test-negative design offers strong advantages and is commonly used to measure the effectiveness of influenza, rotavirus, COVID-19, and other vaccines,
14
  • Thompson MG
  • Stenehjem E
  • Grannis S
  • et al.
Effectiveness of Covid-19 vaccines in ambulatory and inpatient care settings.
, 
21
  • Lopez Bernal J
  • Andrews N
  • Gower C
  • et al.
Effectiveness of the Pfizer-BioNTech and Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccines on covid-19 related symptoms, hospital admissions, and mortality in older adults in England: test negative case-control study.
, 
22
  • Thompson MG
  • Kwong JC
  • Regan AK
  • et al.
Influenza vaccine effectiveness in preventing influenza-associated hospitalizations during pregnancy: a multi-country retrospective test negative design study, 2010–2016.
, 
23
  • Schwartz LM
  • Halloran ME
  • Rowhani-Rahbar A
  • Neuzil KM
  • Victor JC
Rotavirus vaccine effectiveness in low-income settings: an evaluation of the test-negative design.
this study design remains susceptible to the biases present in all observational studies. These biases include selection bias, confounding, and misclassification of vaccine and outcome status. A concern specific to the test-negative design is that because cases and test-negative controls are selected among only those who present to health facilities with illness, there is a potential for the study sample to misrepresent the broader population.
24
  • Westreich D
  • Hudgens MG
Invited commentary: beware the test-negative design.
This concern could be mitigated when the outcome is severe illness that is more likely to result in care-seeking. Knowledge of the care-seeking behaviours of the population of interest is important when interpreting vaccine effectiveness estimates derived by the test-negative design and when considering the appropriateness of this design for a specific setting. A strength of our study is the use of data from a randomised controlled trial of Vi-TT in Malawi.
6

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog